IGMG Genel Sekreteri O\u011fuz \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc, “Anayasa Koruma Dairesi gibi ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc bir kurumun ancak uzun y\u0131llar s\u00fcren bir dava sonucunda, as\u0131ls\u0131z ithamlar\u0131n kamuoyunda yay\u0131lmas\u0131na neden oldu\u011funu itiraf etmesi ve buna son vermeye ancak adli bir s\u00fcre\u00e7 sonunda zorlanmas\u0131n\u0131”\u009d hukuk devleti ilkelerine tamamen ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak niteledi.<\/p>\n
NRW Eyaleti’nin, Aral\u0131k 2001 tarihli “Kuzey Ren Vestfalya’da \u0130slamc\u0131l\u0131k – Dinin politik hedeflere alet edilmesi”\u009d adl\u0131 bro\u015f\u00fcrde as\u0131ls\u0131z ithamlar\u0131 kamuoyuna yaymas\u0131 nedeniyle D\u00fcsseldorf \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nde IGMG’nin a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131l s\u00fcren dava sonunda, IGMG hakk\u0131nda ger\u00e7ek d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ithamlar\u0131 kamuoyuna yaymamay\u0131 taahh\u00fct etti.<\/p>\n
IGMG’nin 22 Kas\u0131m 2002 tarihli as\u0131ls\u0131z ithamlar\u0131 yaymamas\u0131 talebini NRW \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n yerine getirmemesi \u00fczerine, 17 Temmuz 2003’te s\u00f6zkonusu dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. G\u00f6r\u00fcnen o ki Anayasa Koruma Dairesi’nin haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bro\u015f\u00fcrle as\u0131ls\u0131z ithamlar\u0131 yayd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve IGMG’ye iftira etti\u011fi \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan daha o zaman biliniyordu. Bu, s\u00f6zkonusu as\u0131ls\u0131z ithamlar\u0131n \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n internet sayfas\u0131nda bulunan yay\u0131ndan zamanla teker teker kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n
\u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 buna ra\u011fmen davadan bir ay \u00f6nce \u0130dare Mahkemesi’ne yollad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yaz\u0131da ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fu ifadelere yer verdi, “Bro\u015f\u00fcrde bulunan ve davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan itiraz edilen ifadeler bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede kanuna uygundur”\u009d.<\/p>\n
D\u00fcsseldorf \u0130dare Mahkemesi 1. Dairesi’nde seyircilere kapal\u0131 olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada, NRW Eyaleti temsilcileri, Anayasa Koruma Dairesi’nin, “IGMG’nin bir toplant\u0131s\u0131nda Sivas’ta 37 ki\u015finin \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi \u00e7\u0131lg\u0131n bir \u015fekilde kutland\u0131”\u009d veya bir IGMG g\u00f6revlisinin olaylar\u0131 “Sivas’ta \u0130slam galip geldi”\u009d s\u00f6zleriyle yorumlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi ak\u0131l almaz ithamlar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmek zorunda kald\u0131lar.<\/p>\n
Bunun yan\u0131nda bro\u015f\u00fcrde yer alan “IGMG, gen\u00e7lik program\u0131nda gen\u00e7li\u011fi \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anlamda tan\u0131mlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Emperyalizm taraf\u0131ndan arzu edilen gen\u00e7li\u011fi bunun z\u0131tt\u0131 olarak tarif etti\u011fi”\u009d veya gen\u00e7lik program\u0131nda “Dine yap\u0131lan sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n Demokrasi olarak tan\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131”\u009d gibi ithamlar\u0131n da do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 NRW Eyaleti temsilcileri taraf\u0131ndan deklare edildi. Anayasa Koruma Dairesi ayr\u0131ca y\u0131llarca ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir \u015fekilde IGMG’nin kendisini demokrasi d\u00fc\u015fmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yahudi kar\u015f\u0131tl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7eren s\u00f6ylemlerden a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a soyutlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131n\u0131 da dillendirmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n
“Biz, Anayasa Koruma Dairesi’nin IGMG’nin hedefleri hakk\u0131nda y\u0131llar boyu bu ve benzeri sa\u00e7ma ithamlar\u0131 ile kamuoyunu yan\u0131ltmas\u0131 \u00fczerine, daha 2002 y\u0131l\u0131nda NRW Eyaleti \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’ndan as\u0131ls\u0131z ithamlar\u0131ndan vazge\u00e7meyi taahh\u00fct etmesini istedik. \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n as\u0131ls\u0131z ithamlar\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmeye ve durdurmaya yana\u015fmamas\u0131 \u00fczerine dava a\u00e7mak zorunda kald\u0131k. \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 mahkumiyeti \u00f6nleyebilmek i\u00e7in ancak \u015fimdi dava s\u00fcrecinde as\u0131ls\u0131z ithamlar\u0131ndan vazge\u00e7ti\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131. Bu kadar uzun s\u00fcreden ve iftira i\u00e7eren isnatlar\u0131n amac\u0131na ula\u015fmas\u0131ndan sonra, ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc kurum olan Anayasa Koruma Dairesi ve siyasi sorumlulu\u011fu ta\u015f\u0131yan \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n haks\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraf etmelerinin, hak ve hukukun ger\u00e7ek anlamda korunmas\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelmedi\u011fi \u015f\u00fcphe g\u00f6t\u00fcrmez”\u009d diyerek \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ele\u015ftiride bulundu.<\/p>\n
\u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc, “Devlet vergi gelirleriyle dini cemaatlere y\u00f6nelik iftiralar\u0131 finanse edemez. IGMG hakk\u0131nda ger\u00e7ek d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ithamlar\u0131 yayan sadece NRW’deki Anayasa Koruma Dairesi de\u011fil. \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131klar\u0131 hukuki davalara gerek kalmadan sorumluluklar\u0131 alt\u0131nda bulunan Anayasa Koruma Daireleri’nin yasal g\u00f6revleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde kalma ve kamuoyunu yan\u0131ltmamas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamal\u0131d\u0131rlar”\u009d dedi. IGMG’nin Bavyera \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’na kar\u015f\u0131 2002 y\u0131l\u0131ndan beri s\u00fcren davas\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda, “Hak ve hukukun yeteri kadar korunamamas\u0131 tek sorun de\u011fil”\u009d diyen \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc, Meclis kontrol komisyonlar\u0131n\u0131n kontrol imkanlar\u0131n\u0131n da, \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131klar\u0131’ndaki hatalar\u0131 \u00f6nlemek i\u00e7in yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat \u00e7ekti.<\/p>\n
\u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ayr\u0131ca \u015funlar\u0131 s\u00f6yledi, “Kamuoyu, Anayasa Koruma Daireleri’nin M\u00fcsl\u00fcmanlara y\u00f6nelik tav\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rmezlikten gelmemelidir. Aksi taktirde kamuoyunun bask\u0131s\u0131 olmadan dairelerin anayasal hukuk ve toplum a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00e7ok tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131r uygulamalar\u0131na son vermeleri m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. As\u0131ls\u0131z ithamlar\u0131n, \u00e7arp\u0131tmalar\u0131n, manay\u0131 tahrife u\u011fratan anlat\u0131mlar\u0131n ve anayasal hukuk a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da \u00f6zellikle sak\u0131ncal\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmelerin Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Raporlar\u0131’na al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n toplum \u00fczerinde b\u00fcy\u00fck etkisi var. Bu durum toplumda, d\u0131\u015flanan ve ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa maruz kalan m\u00fcsl\u00fcmanlara kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6nyarg\u0131lar\u0131n olu\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 desteklemekte. Nedeni ise raporlara al\u0131nmas\u0131yla bu t\u00fcr te\u015fkilatler\u0131n anayasa d\u00fc\u015fman\u0131 olarak damgalanmas\u0131. Bunun sonucunda kamuoyuna y\u00f6nelik \u00fcst\u00fc kapal\u0131 “Bunlar\u0131 d\u0131\u015flay\u0131n”\u009d s\u00f6ylemi olu\u015fmakta.”\u009d<\/p>\n
Ger\u00e7ekte anayasa kar\u015f\u0131t\u0131 hedefler g\u00fctmeyen s\u00f6zkonusu \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n ve te\u015fkilatlar\u0131n, Anayasa Koruma Raporlar\u0131’na al\u0131nmalar\u0131 sadece temel haklar\u0131n\u0131 zedelemekle kalmamakta, demokrasiye de zarar vermektedir. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc devlet, haks\u0131z aforozlama yoluyla yasal bir temele dayanmaks\u0131z\u0131n, insanlar\u0131n fikir belirleme s\u00fcrecine m\u00fcdahil olmakta ve demokrasinin temel esaslar\u0131n\u0131 hi\u00e7e sayarak, bu s\u00fcrece otoriter anlamda \u015fekil vermeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaktad\u0131r. B\u00f6ylece de devlet g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn Anayasa Koruma Dairesi gibi kurumlar arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fc a\u00e7maktad\u0131r”\u009d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kuzey Ren Vestfalya Eyaleti Anayasa Koruma Dairesi D\u00fcsseldorf \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nde y\u0131llar s\u00fcren dava sonunda, IGMG hakk\u0131nda as\u0131ls\u0131z ithamlar yayd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etti<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[23244,1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.igmg.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3166"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.igmg.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.igmg.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.igmg.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.igmg.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3166"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.igmg.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3166\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.igmg.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3166"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.igmg.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3166"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.igmg.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3166"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}