D\u00fcsseldorf \u0130dare Mahkemesi Remscheid’dan 12 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki bir M\u00fcsl\u00fcman k\u0131z\u0131n karma y\u00fczme dersinden muaf tutulma ba\u015fvurusunu reddetti. (Az.: 18 K 30108). Mahkeme karar\u0131nda \u00f6\u011frencinin korunmaya de\u011fer dini hassasiyetlerini kar\u015f\u0131lamak i\u00e7in \u00e7ok \u00e7e\u015fitli k\u0131yafet imkanlar\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu belirtirken, s\u00f6zkonusu imkanlar\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde din \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlali – \u015fayet b\u00f6yle bir durum tespit edilebilecek olsa dahi – ihtimalinin en aza indirgenmi\u015f olaca\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6ylece kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda devletin e\u011fitim g\u00f6revinin \u00f6ncelik kazanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savundu.<\/p>\n
IGMG Genel Sekreteri O\u011fuz \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131 ele\u015ftirirken, \u00f6zellikle daha \u00f6nceki y\u00fcksek mahkeme i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na dikkat \u00e7ekti ve Federal \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nin 1993 y\u0131l\u0131ndaki karar\u0131na at\u0131fta bulundu (Az.: 6 C 8\/91). Hakimlerin gerek\u00e7elerinin inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade eden \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc, “Hakimler bir yandan \u00f6\u011frencinin dini \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fini kabul ederken, di\u011fer taraftan ortaya koyduklar\u0131 \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm yollar\u0131n\u0131n dine uygunlu\u011funu dikkate almadan s\u00f6zkonusu ihlalin uygun bir k\u0131yafet se\u00e7imi ile a\u015f\u0131labilece\u011fini savunmaktalar. Suyun i\u00e7inde zaten v\u00fccud hatlar\u0131n\u0131n belli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kenarda da bornoz giyilebilece\u011fi ve suya dalma ve \u00e7\u0131kma zamanlar\u0131n\u0131n da kabullenilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda, temel hak sahibi davac\u0131n\u0131n vicdani ma\u011fduriyetini yeterince tetkik edilmedi\u011fini g\u00f6stermektedir”\u009d dedi.<\/p>\n
Mahkemenin karar\u0131n etkilerini ve ciddiyetini kavrayacak durumda olmamas\u0131n\u0131n kendilerini hayal k\u0131r\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131na u\u011fratt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kaydeden \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc, “\u00d6nerilen \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmler g\u00f6stermektedir ki, mahkeme M\u00fcsl\u00fcmanlar\u0131n k\u0131yafet d\u00fczenlemelerinin mant\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kavrama \u00e7abas\u0131na girmemi\u015ftir ve bunlar\u0131 sadece d\u0131\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015f olarak alg\u0131lam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r”\u009d dedi.<\/p>\n
\u0130dare Mahkemesi’nin varolan i\u00e7tihadlar\u0131 hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde dikkate almamas\u0131n\u0131 da anlayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, t\u00fcm bu tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 konular\u0131n Federal \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nin karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturuldu\u011funu belirten \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc, “Ba\u015fka bir karar\u0131 hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karacak, de\u011fi\u015fik \u015fartlar s\u00f6zkonusu de\u011fildir. Mahkeme hem vicdan\u00ee ma\u011fduriyeti kabul etmekte, hemde organizasyonel sorunlardan dolay\u0131 cinsiyetlere g\u00f6re ayr\u0131 bir y\u00fczme dersi imkan\u0131 sunulmas\u0131n\u0131 okuldan beklenemiyece\u011fini s\u00f6ylemekte. Oysa E\u011fitim Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n \u015fartlar do\u011frultusunda personel planlama isteksizli\u011finin birilerinin temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esi olmas\u0131 kabul edilemez”\u009d dedi.<\/p>\n
Genel olarak E\u011fitim Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya \u00f6zelde okulun karma olmayan ders i\u00e7in yeterli personel haz\u0131r bulunduramamas\u0131 veya bulundurmak istememesi hallerinde Federal \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nin karar\u0131n\u0131n gayet a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011funu ifade eden \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc, bununda “M\u00fcsl\u00fcman k\u0131z\u0131n karma y\u00fczme dersinden muaf tutulma zorunlulu\u011fu “\u009d oldu\u011funu kaydetti.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
IGMG Genel Sekreteri O\u011fuz \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc D\u00fcsseldorf \u0130dare Mahkemesi’nin, M\u00fcsl\u00fcman bir k\u0131z \u00f6\u011frencinin karma y\u00fczme dersinden muaf tutulmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki ba\u015fvurusunu reddeden karar\u0131n\u0131 ele\u015ftirdi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[23244,23262,1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.igmg.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5258"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.igmg.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.igmg.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.igmg.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.igmg.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5258"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.igmg.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5258\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.igmg.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5258"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.igmg.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5258"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.igmg.org\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5258"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}